Thursday, August 6, 2009

putting my uterus where my mouth has always been

Within four days of conception, the thought that I was pregnant strayed across my mind and I. Could. Not. Shake it. For the most part, my body felt normal. Ebulliently healthy, in fact. The only thing funny was that my tits hurt. And not with the familiar, liquidy, pendulous ache I feel every month. They felt tight and like they were filled with large-grade gravel. I chased that pregnancy thought around my head for a while, shoving it into corners and under other thoughts, but when my period was one day, two days... six days late, I was not terribly surprised.

***

I keep having versions of this conversation:

Friend: So, I haven't talked to you in a while. How've you been?

Me: Better. I mean, I'm good. I mean, yeah, good.

Friend: What do you mean "better?"

Me: I mean, well, last week was strange.

Friend: Strange?

Me: Yeah, kinda rough. Strange.

Friend: What happened?

Me: I had an abortion last week.

I don't usually lead with announcements of this sort. Mostly, I assume people don't really want to know the details of my physical person when they ask after my well-being. I'm not one to revel in the overshare--or, at least, I'm not when not writing for this blog. But I have been pointedly acclimating myself to saying it. I had an abortion. I've been getting used to not cringing in anticipation of receiving a response I might not like so much. I've been consciously choosing to not hide the simple fact that a terminated pregnancy is part of my personal history now. And also, I've been seasoning myself to the fact that I feel shame about exactly none of it--not the sex, not the pregnancy, not the termination.

Upon the materialization of that nefarious little plus sign, I told a few friends. I waited a while to get used to the idea and then I told my mom. A few people immediately said, "You're not going to write this, are you?"

"I might. Probably. I don't know. I haven't decided."

Under normal circumstances, even the best-intended unsolicited advice makes me tic and shudder with irritation. But I must say I was unprepared for the sort comments I, a girl who happens to do a thing with words now and again, received upon intimating that I might write about aborting a fetus. "Be discrete," they said. "Be reverent, somber." "Protect yourself. It's too personal. You don't want those pro-lifers giving you their opinions on your blog, do you?" "Be respectful. Don't make jokes. This isn't funny." People said these things to me.

You know what? Fuck that.

First of all, I have more rhetorical ammo in my arsenal than any pro-lifer could ever hope to dodge. Seriously, people. If you have a problem with my terminating my fetus on principle, bring it. You people don't scare me. You don't scare me primarily because I can't take you seriously. You stand on the side of neither ethical correctness nor personal responsibility and therefore I have very little respect for your opinion on what goes on in my uterus. I know full well that I write this blog under my true legal identity and I wouldn't be publishing this post if I didn't think I could take the heat.

But secondly, though I know they didn't intend it, having people weigh in on how I should write this story felt tantamount to their telling me how I should feel about my predicament--and the subsequent solution. Somewhere in those well-meaning admonishments, I detect the implication that I, a writer and a woman who has had an abortion, am somehow supposed to be delicate in my discussion of this topic. But guess what? This process begins with fucking and ends with a red-brown smear on a comically thick maxi-pad. There aren't too many delicate things that happen in between.

That said, my decision was as clean, unconflicted and singular as a decision could be. Within 10 minutes of the appearance of my plus sign, I had already called a clinic for an appointment. Since, I have not wavered in my conviction that I was doing the right thing--not even once. Like a premonition, I wrote this post a few months back. In it, I confessed that I had no idea what I'd do if I found something unwelcome in my uterus. And truly, until it happened, I didn't know what I'd do. I mean, all along, I've been aware that I pay an extortionate mortgage on a small-ish condo in one of the most expensive real estate markets in the country. I'm aware that my social infrastructure is a little scanty in the child-rearing-support department. And I know that I am reticent to give my lifestyle the overhaul that having a baby would require I give it. But it was not something I could decide beforehand. I could not be automatic about it. But then, neither could I have known, in advance, of the blissful clarity of thought and internal calm I'd feel in the reality of that moment. I had no idea--not until I felt it.

There really is only one reason the decision was so easy for me. Inviting the guy, whose notch on my bedpost will heretofore be tabbed "the impregnator" (and, alternately, "the narcissist"), into my life--and bed--constituted a poor choice. Truth be told, had the precision-engineered genetic material squirted forth from virtually any other male member with which I've had contact in the last year and a half, I'm nearly positive I would not have felt such single-mindedness. In some strange, inverted way, I suppose that makes me lucky.

So. The guy. Yeah. I met a guy. We went out. On the first date, I thought he was a little boring and had an inflated sense of himself. I didn't imagine we'd go out again. When he texted me something suggestive later that night and followed up with a rather sweet email the next morning, I was flattered. I am easily flattered. But then, over the course of the next two or three dates, I began to tick off a list of inanities as they fell out of his mouth. A vaguely racist comment here. A few tacky digs about other men I've dated there. He frequently claimed to be "charming as hell," which, predictably, had the dual effect of making him seem socially ill-at-ease and uncharmingly arrogant. He accused me of being a film snob and of "over-analyzing" everything. I thought, well, if you don't like that I engage as deeply as I can with every cotton-pickin' thing in my world, you really don't like me. Then I realized it was me who didn't like him. Unceremoniously and definitively, I cut it off.

Two days later, I felt that tightness across my chest. And I couldn't decide what to wear. I blamed girly neurosis and commonplace sartorial indecision when I began changing my outfit 14 times every morning. Nothing fit right. It all itched and hung at an angle. I'd never, in my adult life, felt less sexy--in every last article of clothing I own. And then, internally, recurrently: I'm pregnant. Quiet. It's nothing. Fuck, I'm pregnant.

I still shake my head at the boneheadedness that got me into this age-old pickle. With a dude so cacophonously sub par, no less. But, simply put, I've had worse sex. Had he been able to keep some of those stale pomposities corked up inside him, he might have kept me entertained for another week or two with the sex alone. Between my inability to deflect the lavish demands of my libido and my irrational, yet persistent, anxiety that I may never have sex again, I'm rarely motivated to say "no." So, I don't know, somewhere around Round Three or Four one night (so as to not paint the poor fellow as utterly irredeemable, I really should concede that his stamina and resilience were definitive checks in his pro column), we ran out of his preferred style of condom. He imperiously objected to whatever I happened to have in my purse. Then, classily, he proceeded to make fun of me for having dated guys with cocks small enough to fit into them. He totally did. In the moment, his uncouthness left me too flummoxed to say anything about the teasing. Perhaps if I had said something, I would have been better able to shed the bitterness I continue to taste when I think of him.

So, sure, I knew I was ovulating. But I was also burnt out from having to play rousing games of Condom Police with nearly every guy I meet. I've had a perfectly good education about birth control methods, thank you. I know my options. But my experiments with hormone-therapy-based birth control have been disastrous and I'm nervous about slippage and increased recurrent UTI risk (I'm already quite prone) with copper IUDs and other insertable items. So condoms remain my only and my last resort. I'd love to generalize, averring that women are simply more aware of their personal consequences, in terms of condom-free sex, but, of course, that's not universally true-- I certainly have been with incredibly meticulous men who are all about the condom love. Regardless, I so often feel put in the position of being the safe-sex enforcer--a stance of suckage. I am the one, after all, faced with the decisions, the costs and the bodily disturbance when worse does (did) indeed come to worst.

That night, I was wet and lacking conviction when I suggested we delay. I caved. And he probably waited about a beat and a half too long to pull out. He came mostly into the crease of my thigh.

I realize this story is rife with dumbassedness, especially considering we weren't a couple of ill-prepared teenagers, but rather, two sexually experienced adults in our 30s. But it's exactly that that makes it a particularly valid little cautionary tale. Folks, it happens. It happened. What can I say? Fecundity, sex drive, all of it: signs of proper bodily function. Of health. They're also terribly dangerous toys.

***

I don't owe anyone a justification for my decision. I'm not trying to convince anyone I did the right thing. But because I'm shooting for accuracy and honesty, here's what was in my head as I stared at my fateful pee stick: I figured I had three options: 1) I could have the kid and selfishly deny it access to its father, out of my own shuddering distaste for him; 2) I could have the kid and spend the rest of my life resenting both it and the guy, the guy and I could have 18 years worth of epic battles over personal values and child-rearing decisions, and I could stretch my already tight budget beyond capacity, thus raising my own child with far less privilege than my parents granted me; or 3) I could terminate.

I was so lucky. My choice couldn't have been clearer. Option #1 was out of the question. I could never prevent a kid from knowing its father. That's ugly karma in which I don't care to partake. And no way, no how was I going to bind myself, for the rest of my life, to an anti-intellectual jockstrap registered fucking Republican ("I voted for Obama, though. Hope I don't regret it!" Oof. Like a post-coital whomp to my belly. ) -- much less do so to some poor, unsuspecting infant. The chances of him and me being able to maturely co-parent with a reasonable degree of accord? Laughably slim, right? I simply couldn't have let it happen. It would have made not two, but three lives exponentially more difficult. No argument in the world could convince me that there's a shred of ethical propriety to be found in that option.

***

I've written several drafts of this post. I've been bashing my head into it, unable to settle on an approach. I thought about detailing the procedure itself and the two fairly harrowing days that proceeded it. Fears of miscarrying, extra blood tests, delays, cramping, nausea, nerves-- all of it. Because no account of the abortive experience was real for me until I had my own. At times, I thought maybe I could try my hand at that version.

I thought about writing a letter to my doctor. I wanted to tell him about how rare and thoughtful and cautious and empathetic I found him to be--and how lucky I felt to have serendipitously become his patient. For the first time in years, a conventional medical practitioner put aside the hierarchical doctor-patient relationship structure in order to listen to me. I have a mild clotting disorder. Even minor surgery is a little more risky, a little more nerve-wracking for me. He talked to me, called for extra bloodwork and reassured me. The clinic I chose does a volume business, so his personal attention was more than that for which I could have asked.

Lucky. I am. Really.

Oh, and the sorority. I've begun initiating conversations with women close to me--the ones I knew had also terminated pregnancies. I wrote to women who'd written their own narratives-- to learn more, to say thanks, to affirm and be affirmed. That day in the clinic, even, I shared how-I-got-knocked-up and I'll-never-do-that-again stories with the jittery women waiting with me. All of those stories--varied as they are--are in my head now. They're part of this, crammed in here too. It's a bond. I can't explain it.

And I'd be remiss to not speak to very cool part of being pregnant. I felt such unexpected relief when I realized that, somewhere in the my mind's recesses, the fact that I'd never gotten pregnant before, despite all the messing around I've done, had bred a niggling worry that I might not be able to if I tried. In a strange synchronicity, it seems the author of one of my favorite blogs, Nightmare Brunette, has been going through something similar. She says this about the body's independent machinations:

Conception is still fundamentally a pretty amazing thing. In this condition, I could move to a place with no other people and, in less than a year, I would have made my own company. It's stupid to try to pretend it isn't special, to act like it's mundane and not miraculous to have this event trying to happen inside my body. You don't have to be religious or spiritual to think the ways nature works are exciting. You just have to not be a cynic.
She's not wrong.

And then there's my body's healing process: roughly 48 hours after an abortion, progesterone and other pregnancy-elevated hormones begin to dissipate in the blood. Morning sickness subsides. The mind sweetens into new relief and pre-pregnancy order. And despite all my best intentions for putting myself on a sex diet, my body began feverishly campaigning to get its pregnancy back. Gnuuh. Fertility. The staggering uptake in my cocklust had me swimming in flesh in my dreams, both regular and day. I've been haze-headed, soupy, lit-aflame-with-the-libidinous-directive and, really, nearly euphoric.

But it's all just too much. Too big. More than one measly blog post can possibly hold. I'm sorry. My form fails me.

***

Ultimately, I suppose the particularities of any of the writerly approaches I might have taken do not comprise anything unusual--and maybe not even anything all that interesting. The Planned Parenthood website says that "1 in 3 American women have abortions by the time they are 45." That's an awful lot of us. And yet, I've only read a handful of firsthand accounts. Why is that? The sheer paucity of these narratives is a problem, I think.

Right after my procedure, my doctor asked me, "OK, what are you going to do now for birth control? Because I don't want to see you again unless I run into you on the street. Although, of course, you might not want to acknowledge how you know me." Even he, a man who makes a living by providing this necessary service to his community--and, as Dr. Tiller's murder reminds us, risks his life to do so--is so deeply inculturated with the notion that unintended pregnancies and their subsequent terminations are humiliating for women that he back-stepped at his own hypothetical musing about he and I running into each other. But I wasn't humiliated. I said, "Doctor, I am not ashamed of this. Actually, I'd be proud to acknowledge that I know a man who does what you do." I don't think he was expecting me to say that. But I meant it.

Nevertheless, there still aren't all that many women telling this story--not publicly, not with their names attached. Even the article I linked in my previous post was submitted anonymously. Had I been able to write to its author and thank her personally, I would have. I was, however, able write to one Ms. Chelsea G. Summers to thank her for her three remarkable posts in which she details her experiences, and the fallout of telling of her experiences, over on her blog. Her posts gave me perspective and, well, kept me company that night after my surgery. And also, she makes a point that, frankly, goes unsaid far too often:

It’s no secret that I've had seven abortions, which is, I admit, a lot. I have narrated my abortions in stark detail, and I have discussed how people who identified themselves as pro-choice castigated me for my recurrent choice to terminate my pregnancies. Looking back on my life and the fifteen-year period of these abortions, I believe that my choice to abort was absolutely correct, even if my fuzzy choices that led to my getting pregnant were not. Faced with the same decision again—an unlikely scenario as I’m now about as likely to get pregnant as I am to die in my bathtub—I would unhesitatingly choose to terminate the pregnancy.


I've written about how difficult it was for me to come forward and tell the story of my abortions. I haven’t written so much about how rewarding it has been to hear from other women who have suffered as I did in the shadow of their silence. These women were afraid of voicing their experience of choosing to terminate a pregnancy, just as I was. We all lived in fear of being judged. Reading my story, many women came forward and thanked me.

Though I have been quite open about all this with most people in my life (and now with whomever reads my blog), I continue take her point well: no matter how right the decision, the telling of the tale is still a loaded act.

It's been a real challenge for me to write this post. My usual blurt-it-out-don't-look-back writing process had been shot to hell as I've fought through an anxiety about whatever judgment may yet come my way. Not only do I feel like what I'm writing is important enough that I care whether it's "good," but I also feel nerve jabs in my stomach every time I get close enough to finishing it to hit that "Publish Post" button at the bottom of my screen. Atop all the self-doubt I usually feel about my writing, an excruciating awareness of the political load that this issue bears has threatened to snow my post under more than once. As I said before, it's not that I'm ashamed of the act--any of the acts. But I will be ashamed if I can't manage to write a piece compelling enough to be worthy of the textual heritage of the issue at hand. For that reason, I too have been afraid of voicing my experience. Plainly put, I am more afraid of letting down my sorority sisters with a half-assed telling than I could ever be of a bunch of folks who disagree with me on the basis of religio-social principles that have no bearing on my life.

That said, the stories are, indeed, beginning to wend their way out of the closet--and with increasing momentum. The other day, a friend sent me a link to this HuffPo article about Ms. Magazine's upcoming "We Had Abortions" issue. 5000 women signed a petition, which will appear in the issue, acknowledging that this event is part of their histories too. Signing that petition is no small act, considering that people continue to die for us to have this right. That article also mentions another Steinem brainchild, The Choices We Made, which anthologizes a series of celebrity-written essays on the topic. The narratives are piling up, and as they do, I can't help but feel like the politics I've been preaching for all of my aware life are being validated. That's the power of these stories. We need them because the dominant narrative (Abortion is traumatic! It's emotionally depleting! It's crushing and sad and conflicted!) that exists in the social imagination doesn't have much in common with the reality of the experience.

I wasn't traumatized. It was the pregnancy that depleted me; ending mine restored me. When it's right (and I do not assume that it's given that abortion is always--or even often--right), it's neither sad nor burdensome. It's not even terribly upsetting. I didn't feel anything of those things.

***

I did feel something, though. Three things, to be exact.

I expected I'd be scared. I was scared. Not petrified, really, but on tenderhooks, for sure. I'm wary of conventional medicine in general and having my guts plumbed isn't high on my list of favored party games. I was scared in the way that I'd be scared before any medical procedure--not, specifically, because I was to have my uterus sucked clean. The specifics of the abortion, in fact, were really only incidental to my anxiety.

I also expected to feel lonely. I can't deny that, in the exam room, I had one of the most acute moments of psychological isolation I've felt since I was a kid. That room contained one doctor, one nurse and one patient. In truth, it was me and my decision, alone on a cold table. When the nurse offered her hand, I leapt at it. So grateful was I. In that singular moment of my own exaggerated cognitive withdrawal, another human recognized that I was a human--a human in pain. And she held my hand. Almost immediately, I felt like I was imposing (because I usually feel that way when people are kind to me) and I thanked her. And then I realized it was her job and felt silly...but still grateful. Such are these moments, I suppose.

But I never expected I'd feel moved. It's one thing to feel imperturbably assured of the correctness of your choices. It's quite another to feel uplifted deep down in your consciousness by the very ordeal to which your choice has led you. In the hours and days that have followed my abortion, and even in the recovery room immediately thereafter, I've been thinking quite a lot about all the activists who've spent their productive lives fighting for me to have all the readily available options that I do. The abortion providers who continue to be murdered as a direct result of their conviction that we should trust women have come to new prominence in my thinking. And I've been remembering how I was the only girl at my 8th grade lunch table preaching the pro-choice ethic that forcing a woman to bear a child is a disproportionate punishment for a few seconds of orgasmic accident. In the end, I didn't wish this mess upon myself. However, I have found the experience of living out the bottom line of my own long-held political stance--in a tangible way, within my own body--to be a profound one. Asserting this sort of empirical authority over my physical person hits deep. No other way to say it.

***
And after that, what is there left to say?

This, I suppose: in publishing this post, I'm aware that I may be forfeiting (tiny readership or otherwise) whatever privacy to which I might once have clung in favor of asserting that my abortion is not something I want to hide. That, too, is my choice.

I think it's a good choice. But I know it's a choice that may well might me bite me in the ass. That's okay. A little ass-biting is still better than forced parenthood.

24 comments:

chelsea g. said...

Thank you for being brave, being honest, being forthright and being true to yourself. Thank you, in short, for telling your story.

hugs,
chelsea g. summers

JJ said...

Thank you.

Shinejil said...

I think you made the right choice. Thanks for sharing your feelings so boldly and unabashedly; I hope it comforts women out there who are facing the decision with less confidence.

I'm glad so many people have fought for my rights, too.

Jonathan said...

Very well done!

Anonymous said...

I'm proud of you, Jam. cmr

Anonymous said...

I admire your courage to share your convictions and vulnerabilities with such clarity and not be trapped by the whims of the social mind, Love

Lanea said...

I congratulate you for your honesty and bravery. It maddens me that so few women feel safe enough to do what you have done--safe enough to own their own sexuality without feeling shame; safe enough to choose an abortion if it's best for them; and safe enough to say both publicly. I'm so glad you had good medical care, and so grateful for the work our mothers' generation did to win this right for us.

Anonymous said...

I have never had an abortion, but I have assisted with hundreds of them. From confirming pregnancy tests, checking for anemia, assisting the doctor, holding the girls hand, to even examining the tissue to make sure everything had been removed. Some of the women travelled hours because they didn't have access to abortion services where they lived. While I was occasionally frustrated with women who seemed to use abortion as birth control, overall the experience made me more pro-choice then ever. Thank you for sharing your story. I don't think I'd have the courage to share mine so publicly.

Yonit said...

A truly inspiring post. Many times people's honesty is in an "in your face" manner, and while your writing style is usually of that manner,this piece at least didn't read that way, though it was sort of written as such. You sounded almost apologetic (to whom?) and you shouldn't be-not in the least. I heart you for making a decision and sticking to it and being so brave about it. Then sharing it. Not many women are able to do that.

brownrabbit said...

Friends, relations, strangers--

I'm truly humbled by your comments. You call me brave and really, I don't think I ever felt brave--merely...practical, I guess. But I'm so grateful for all your kind words. It's beyond meaningful to get this kind of feedback. I know I'll never find words to express just exactly how meaningful it is, but please know I feel it.

chelsea g.-- thank you, in particular for setting precedence and, in many ways, making it okay for me to write this. Had I not read your account all those months ago, I'm not sure I would have gotten this one out. And thanks for your personal support over the last couple of weeks as well. My crush on you grows daily.

And Yonit-- I'm not sure I'm apologetic, exactly. It's more like I'm humbled by the project I set for myself--which was to relay my experience as accurately and honestly as I could so as to, I dunno, provide some sort of resource, even if it's just a measly little personal account, to other women who may have been through it or may yet do so. Fundamentally, I have trouble conceiving of a situation in which my little dramas could be meaningful or relevant to anyone else, so getting over that brand of self-doubt was definitely a hurdle in writing this piece. So, I wanted to be careful that I was true to that feeling-- and that I didn't attack the issue with some sort of braggadocio I don't feel. Does that make sense?

That said, I have gotten some comments through other venues (i.e., not directly on this blog) in which folks have been less supportive-- calling me self-indulgent and selfish and asking whether I "thought of the child."

It was my intention to make it clear that, to me, the karmic collateral damage of bringing a kid into a miserable existence and irreparably damaging the lives of two extant adults is really and truly FAR greater than whatever I might incur through the abortion itself. I DID think of the kid. And I believe I did right by the kid. Folks may disagree-- and that's fair. They certainly have that right. But nonetheless, that won't change the fact that I don't doubt the ethical correctness of this decision.

However, my skin is probably a fair amount thinner than I would like it to be. Those sorts of comments are hard to take. I know I invited them but they still hurt. But then again, I didn't set out to change minds with this post. I meant only to bear witness, to relay my experience and to try to be true to other women who've terminated pregnancies or may one day need to. I know not every woman has as smooth an experience as I did... but I can't tell that story, because it's not mine. For me, this experience is not one that will haunt me, but one that brought the real blessings of my life into sharper focus. I'm glad of that and no more ashamed of that feeling than I am of the act itself.

So, again-- thank you all. You've provided a thoughtful and, again, humbling cushion on which I could land.

Namaste--
M

jb said...

Your post IS brave.

I'll admit I was worried when I heard you were going to write about this, worried about people sorta coming after you for it.

In a way, it's good to hear some of the not-so-great reaction. 'Did you think of the kid". Really? That's obviously exactly what you were doing. Anyone who would ask such a stupid question of a women who just decided to have an abortion is disrespectful and ignorant.

It's true that Americans are bombarded by the cliches and horror stories that supposedly represent what abortion is. It sounds stupid but we need to remember that those representations are made largely by people who have no idea what the experience is really like. That's why your account and others like it, mentioned here, are so important--even for liberal feminists like myself. I don't think I realized how much those cliches had worked their way into my subconscious re:the topic.

Thx

April said...

Wow, what an amazing post. Good for you for sharing it. You are indeed brave, and a beautiful writer on top of that.

Thank you so much.

a

Anonymous said...

Like it or not, you ARE brave for putting yourself out there so naked in the public eye. I had a feeling this was what was bothering you, but I knew you would share when ready. You know you made the right choice for you, that's all that matters

007

Melissa said...

Well, I think you made a brave decision. Not one I have had to make, but that's only the roll of the dice. Wish I could have been there to hold your hand.

Sommer said...

Thank you, Marjorie.

NB said...

I'm so glad you wrote this, and thank you for the emails. I thought the same thing; I thought I just couldn't get pregnant. And as immature as it is, I know my boyfriend and I were testing that—and, well, now we know I thought wrong.

Ceolaf said...

A remarkable post, and a valuable contribution to the public for all the reasons you state or imply. But I also have a question for you, the writer who claims, "I engage as deeply as I can with every cotton-pickin' thing in my world."

Why didn't you consider adoption? Why didn't it jump to mind as one of your options? Why didn't it occur to you before you actually had your abortion Why didn't you comment on it in your blog post?

Or, looking back, what do you think about adoption, now? What is it about society, your family, your friends, you or anything else that kept it off the table?

I do not mean to suggest that you should have chosen adoption. I know far far far too little about you to be able to address that question. I am not judging your decision to terminate your pregnancy. Rather, I am curious about the thinking process of such a thoughtful woman.

brownrabbit said...

That is, I suppose, a reasonable question.

I gotta say, though, I'm encountering a little bit of resentment at being put through it's paces. As I realize that may be a kneejerk emotional reaction on my part, I'll offer this:

Adoption was never and never will be an option for me. My blood disorder makes pregnancy far riskier for me than it is for a lot of women. Of course, some women encounter other and far greater risks than I have-- and they're willing to put their bodies through it even anyway. But for me, if I'm going to undertake a risk to my life and that of a potential kid, I'm going to raise the kid myself. And the pregnancy will have been on purpose. Putting myself through a full-term pregnancy for whatever financial payout I might receive through an adoption? For... what? the general bonhomie of knowing I gave some childless couple a white baby? It's just not worth it. It's too scary, too stressful, too much.

I did, however, think about including my reasons for not considering adoption in my post, but had I done so, I would have derailed into so many digressions-- why I freaked out when I started bleeding two nights before my procedure, why I was living in fear of a miscarriage throughout the pregnancy, why the doctor took a special interest in me, etc. In fact, all those stories are in a couple of the other drafts I wrote. But, as the post was already plenty long, I made an editorial decision that all these little details would have to be part of a story for another day. My hashing through all that stuff seemed defensive and kinda irrelevant to what I was trying to convey in my post. I opted to leave it out.

So, ultimately, it's not "society" or my upbringing or anything else that keeps adoption off the table--it's that, since I started menstruating, my doctors have put the fear o' god in me regarding childbirth. Some may criticize me for putting my own life above that of a fetus, particularly when there ARE measures that exist that could reduce the risks, if I ever enter a situation in which I actually CHOOSE to have a kid of my own. But why would I put myself through it? Why, when, over the years, so many medical professionals have advised me against it? Why, when other safer, less disruptive options exist?

So, then, the real question is whether I would have made the same decision if I didn't have specific medical concerns, eh? And, yeah, to be perfectly honest, I would've. It's my body. I'm the one who gets to say what happens to it. As such, I say I don't want to have any unintended babies. And the great thing about my having the right to say that is I don't have to justify it. Not one bit. Not to anyone.

I don't know if this clarifies anything--or just makes me seem more defensive than ever. It might. I guess I worry about that a little. But the bottom line is that pregnancies, even in the best of cases, are scary and hard on the body. They're nine months of constant watchfulness, if not straight-up fretfulness. Maybe I'm just not generous enough to put myself through it unless it's very, very purposeful.

I hope that makes SOME sense, anyway.

Ceolaf said...

Yeah, that makes some sense. And it does make you seem a bit more defensive.

That is, until the rest of that penultimate paragraph, the part your label the "bottom line." That seems to be the bottom line of your original piece, and the reality of your decision.

In the spirit of "engaging deeply" -- what most people call "overanalyzing" -- I'm intrigued by the difference between your post and your more complete story. In reality, you had a specific medical concern that made your story a little unusual in a particular way. In leaving it out, you wrote of somewhat more universal concerns at the expense of giving your readers a more accurate picture. Of course, there is not necessarily anything wrong with that.

However, as you mention in this comment, your own medical concern raises an important issue. How we do value the life/safety of the adult woman vs. the life/safety of the baby/fetus/whatever that is that is growing inside of the adult?

We don't really think about how dangerous pregnancy is, even in the most typical of situations. In the choice/anti-choice debate, we too often skip over the inconvenience, discomfort, pain and real risk of pregnancy. Another post about abortion -- by you or about someone else -- could mine that. Perhaps you are particularly well suited for it, as "doctors have put the fear o' god in [you] regarding childbirth," something the rest of us have not gotten in many decades -- at least in this country. Of course, not having gone through it, you are probably not the woman to write that post.

(Yes, woman write about personal stories about pregnancy, with all of its negative aspects. But I do not often (ever?) see them in the context of question of having an abortion.)

But I would like to get back to adoption. I asked you because you were so open and honest and thoughtful in your post, and seemed to be an honest and thoughtful person in real life. I do not think that we really examine the costs of adoption (including the costs of the pregnancy) to the birth mother in the choice/no-choice debate or the few public writings about the personal abortion/no-abortion decision.

Perhaps a common idea in this comment of mine is regard for the adult woman. One might call it selfishness, but I think that that would be a mistake. Rather, it is a matter of regarding the adult woman as a person, one whose concerns and well-being should be considered rather than taken for granted.

In other words, how much should a woman have to give? How much can be asked, and how much can be demanded, or even assumed?

I do not that think that we really think about that. At least, we do not do so nearly enough.

brownrabbit said...

Wait-- in real life? Do I know you?

OK, regardless-- I think what maybe I didn't say (but you did, in so many words) is that, in this debate, abortion and adoption are placed opposite each other as roughly equal options. And they're not. For a million reasons that I probably can't address in a comment.

But I can start here: pregnancy--in the early stages, I guess, because that's all to which I can testify-- frankly, ain't much fun. For the first three weeks of mine, I felt great. Very healthy, great energy... And then one morning, about a week after I peed on a stick, I woke up and the morning sickness had kicked in-- and it didn't go away until 2 days after the procedure. Of course, I'm highly averse to puking (a little phobic, actually) so that constant anxiety that I was going to throw up, coupled with the nausea itself made me a fairly miserable human being for those few weeks. I also think I got a little bit anemic, so I was was having a lot of trouble staying awake until I started in with some iron supplements. The idea of prolonging that level of anxiety and illness for a full nine months? I get tight in the chest just thinking about it.

Beyond that, pregnancy is never an easy thing for a body to go through. True, we don't hear about women dying in childbirth much anymore--but bajillions of things can go wrong, either with the fetus or with the woman, at any point. And even if nothing goes wrong, the women who feel fan-freakin'-tastic for the duration are, well, so rare I'm tempted to call them mythical beings. To say pregnancy is uncomfortable is an understatement, right?

Pregnancy also has, inevitably, a lasting effect on the body of the mother. Though this may sound like simple vanity, I actually worry about what a full-term pregnancy could do to me quite a lot. I personally stake no small portion of my identity on my sexual persona--and my physical body. On my blog and in real life, I'm a potty-brained little slut-- and I like it that way. What pregnancy does to hormones and tits and pussies? Oh, god. I'm afraid I'd hardly know myself afterwards. I'm afraid I'd be a completely different person--a person I like a lot less than the potty-brained slut. That's really NOT just vanity-- that's a question of self-identity that I'm not really willing to face until I'm good and ready. Particularly not if I'm going to give a kid away.

So, I really couldn't agree with you more when you asked, "how much should a woman have to give?" If we're going to pit abortion against adoption as equally viable options (kinda like your original question did), we really can't ignore the fact that we're asking a woman to sacrifice not only 9 months of her life but part of her deep-down identity for ever after when we ask her to opt out of abortion. I don't hear that said very often, and maybe I think it should be.

Simply put, they AREN'T equally viable options--not for me. I do not think it's possible for me personally to have a baby, give it up, and not give up a big chunk of myself--one way or another--in the doing. From my perspective, that's a MUCH bigger sacrifice, on a psychological level, than it's often given credit for being.

Anyway-- I'm not sure I'm articulating any of this all that clearly. It's emotional. I'm rambling. Apologies!

Ceolaf said...

I don't think that you rambled, and I think that you did a much better job of addressing these issues that I ever could.

Nine months of anxiety and fear? That is torturous. It does not have to be the most common reaction to be a valid one. That's a long time to live on edge -- especially when there are real health consequences behind it. It is awfully easy for others to say that it goes away and the iron supplements take care of it. It *usually* goes away, but what about if it does not? Having the "fear o' god in [you] regarding childbirth," is old school -- and a lot more appropriate than the blithe ignorance that is the rule today.

I did not even consider the self-identity thing. Athletes face a real existential crisis when they cannot compete anymore, or no longer can compete at the level they used to. Of course, I don't just mean professionals. We build our identities in all kinds of ways, some with more physical components than others. Heck, men losing their hair can pose a sort of identity crisis, and as you mentioned, this is not just some vanity thing. It is identity. So, if your self-identity has such a physical component, a threat to your long term physique is threat to your self.

Is that selfish? Of course! But we owe ourselves a certain amount of selfish self-preservation. We all do. Is it excessively selfish? I don't think so -- though I acknowledge that this is where legitimate differences in opinion might begin to arise.

There is an area that we disagree on. While I agree that abortion and adoption are not "equal options," I think that I have a better opinion of than you. Yes, it demands much more of the adult woman than the abortion -- as least in the ways important to you (and me). But there are potential costs to abortion as well, some of which you see and some of which you do not. For some, pregnancy itself is a benefit, not just a cost. In some view, there is value to the "life" of the "baby." Therefore, those who see the fetus as a person -- or at least closer to a person than I do -- and who want to experience pregnancy, abortion means something quite different than it does to you.

This is not to say that I disagree with your decision. It clearly was your right, and you were especially thoughtful about. I applaud you apparent lack of shame, both in talking about it with your friends and in this public medium. And I especially note -- especially appreciate -- the care with which you ownership of your viewpoint without casting it as universal that all women feel. "Simply put, they AREN'T equally viable options--not for me." Sadly, that is an incredibly rare thing to do.

As for knowing you? No, sadly I do not. I am fascinated by you and would love to know you has a friend in my life, but do not. I was just referring to the fact that you had a particular personal medical aspect to your decision (i.e. part of real life) that you did not include in your original post.

Alex said...

"Within 10 minutes of the appearance of my plus sign, I had already called a clinic for an appointment."

Obviously you didn't tell him before the decision (and I'm not suggesting you should have), but I'm curious: did you tell him at all? Did he find out through this post? Or even now, does he still not know?

brownrabbit said...

Hi, Alex--

To be very honest, I'm reticent to answer this question publicly. It's possible that my answering it could have touchy legal ramifications.

I'll say this: I have been assured by a couple friends with law degrees that I am well within my rights to control the flow of information as I see fit.

But if you want to know more, I'm going to ask that you email me privately.

Diggey said...

LOVE!